|
AMBASSADORIAL SCREENING: NNAMANI DAZZLES
SENATORS |
|
He came late to the Senate. He took his oath of office and allegiance
on June 26 after his other colleagues had taken theirs on June 5, this
year the day the Senate was inaugurated. When he arrived at the Committee
Hearing Room 1 of the Senate where the Senators were doing their
documentations, it was with pomp and ceremony. His loyalists in the
National Assembly, including the Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike
Ekweremadu were on hand to accord the founder of Ebeano (meaning where we
are) Political Group in Enugu State, former Governor and current member of
the upper Legislative House, Senator Chimaroke Ogbonnia Nnamani, a well
deserved honour. The challenges he had to contend with in recent times had taken him out
of the Senate most of the time. He became more frequent to the Senate in
the past two or three weeks. He would sit calmly in his seat on the back
row like someone who is trying to rediscover himself. Perhaps, like
someone who is trying to solve a political jig-saw puzzle of seeing his
former loyalists – Ekweremadu (Deputy Senate President) and Ayogu Eze
(Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Information) holding
strategic positions in the same chamber in which he is just a
Vice-Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Nnamani clad in a blue-black suit, stood up, dropped the report he was
holding on his seat, locked his two hands in front of him as a gentleman
preacher and began to speak on his assignment of the committee. Many of
his colleagues were amazed to see him make his presentations without
reading from the report, yet everybody including the Nigerians in the
public gallery, thought he was reading from the report. He reeled out
dates of when the Senate mandated the Committee to go ahead and screen the
62 Ambassadorial Nominees, the dates of the Committee’s sittings, the
modalities, the findings and recommendations. He had said that he was
going by the synopsis of the report. It was indeed synoptic and yet all
embracing. He did not falter in is speech. The eloquence and the language
of presentation almost drew applause. The presentation set the stage for the consideration of the report and
subsequent confirmation of the 58 Ambassadorial nominees that were
screened by the Committee. They included, among others, the National
Chairman of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Dr. Ahmadu Adah
Ali, Senators Musiliu Obanikoro, Dalhatu Tafida, Abdallah Wali, Professor
Joy Ogwu and Brigadier General Oluwole Rotimi (rtd). But the confirmation
of the 58 persons did not end the controversy over the screening at the
Senate. Three of the nominees, namely former Lagos State Military
Adminstrator, Brigadier General Buba Marwa, (rtd), former Aviation
Minister, Dr. (Mrs) Kema Chikwe and Third Republic Senator, Polycarp Nwite
were precluded form the screening on the ground of some unfavorable
security repots. That became a point of contention. Senators had argued that the senate
should not surrender its constitutional power to screen nominees to the
Executive via some unfavorable security reports. When the Senate
President, Senator David Mark saw that senators were pressurizing the
Committee Chairman to divulge the content of the security report, he
(Mark) suggested that the Senate should resolve into a close session.
Senator Aminu had also suggested a close session to enable the Senate iron
out the issue. Before then, Senator Chris Anyanwu (Imo State) had expressed concern
that the Committee did not screen Chikwe from the state on the ground of
security reports and wondered what manner of report it was that would stop
the screening of “the nominee who is very qualified and has served the
nation well.” Senator Aminu had said that the security report was brought by Senator
Ita-Giwa. He said that she brought only a copy which he passed round to
members of the Committee to sight and read. The trend of contributions on
the issue was veering in the direction of laying blame at the doorsteps of
Senator Ita-Giwa, but the decision to go into close door saved the day for
her. Further discussion on the issue moved into a close session which lasted
from 1.20 pm and ended at 1.35pm. The matter was discussed in 15 minutes.
THISDAY gathered that at the close session, the security report was
discountenanced, even as the Senate directed the Committee to go ahead and
screen the trio of Marwa, Chikwe and Nwite. It was learnt that initially the Senate President had wanted be report
to be circulated to senators to read, having been read by the eleven
members of the Committee, but he was said to have argued that since the
Senate was not hampered by the report from performing its constitutional
role of screening the nominees, the committee should be asked to proceed
with the exercise. Sources at the close session said that the security
reports were neither circulated nor read out. But feelers said that there were no negative security reports against
Senator Nwite for instance. Nwite in a letter of complaints to the Senate
President had challenged the Senate to publish the security report against
him so that he could clear his name. It was gathered that the Presidency
had to intervene in his case, asking the SSS to clarify to it the security
report against Nwite and the response was in his favor. Nwite had admitted
that he had worked as a security agent before and there was nothing
against him. It was learnt that there was no security report against him.
There were indications that the Presidency might investigate the matter
with a view of finding out if any of its top officials was trying to use
his or her office for personal vendetta. THISDAY gathered that the Senate
President took charge of the close session and put a note of finality to
the position that the so-called security reports should be pushed
aside. He was said to have reasoned that if there were reports to the effect
that the nominees had committed crimes, then it would be an indictment on
the capacity of law-enforcement agencies of the Executive arm not to have
charged them appropriately to court with their offences. He said that the
fact that they are still walking freely indicated that there was nothing
serious against them. Therefore, he did not want the Senate to dissipate
its energy on the issue more so when the reports cannot stop the Senate
from performing its constitutional function of screening the
nominees. When the Senate reconvened at 2.30 p.m, in plenary to approve the votes
and proceedings of last Thursday because the Senate wanted to suspend
plenary till December 11 in order to allow the Appropriation Committee to
consider the 2008 budget, a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee,
Senator Abubakar Sodangi, speaking for the Committee, assured the Senate
that the trio of Marwa, Chikwe and Nwite would be screened last Friday in
concurrence with the decision of the Senate in close session. Chairman of
the Senate Committee on Media and Information, Senator Ayogu Eze said that
the Committee’s report on the trio would be submitted when the Senate
resumes plenary on December 11. According to him, “It was the decision of the Senate in close session
that we are not security agencies; we are not the appointing officers and
that we have no business with security reports. If the Executive was not
pleased with the nominees, they had the option to withdraw them, but since
the nominees are with us, we are going to go ahead and screen them and
clear them.” Eze said the Committee on Foreign Affairs was also cleared of
any wrongdoing in the close session. Hear him: “last week, there was an attempt to bring a motion to the
effect that they overreacted themselves in maybe talking to the press, but
we found out that their proceedings were held in open court. It was an
open hearing and whatever was picked by the press was picked in the open
just like anybody. So, we found that the Committee had not done any wrong
and we put it on record and cleared them of any wrongdoing.” the leeway provided by the Senate that it cannot be hampered by
security report from doing its job, the Committee will go ahead and screen
and most likely recommend them for clearance. The position that the Senate
has adopted is to leave the nominees once cleared at the mercies of the
executive that appointed them to do whatever it (executive) likes with
them.
|
|
|