|
I Can’t Be Misled By
the Elite |
|
Chimaroke Nnamani, governor of
Enugu State is a man who is never overwhelmed by obstacles, no matter
how
daunting. He believes that there is always a way to get anything
done; that there is a solution to every problem, and even if that
only way involves risk-taking, he would try it.
His background as a fetal surgeon prepared him adequately for this. He distinguished himself in America in this rare area of medicine. Having done that he wanted to take more challenges. This time around, he looked beyond the shores of America and remembered his own country - Nigeria. He came and took a plunge into the murky waters of Nigerian politics. Again, he conquered. He beat all his rivals to become Enugu State governor in May 1999. In 2003, the obstacles against his re-election became much more formidable, with Chief Jim Nwobodo, then the father of Enugu State politics leading the opposition. Again, he silenced them all. Nnamani realized that power won through the support of the people is not meant to be kept idle. It is to be used to promote the welfare of the electorate. Today, he is doing just that. He is transforming Enugu into a model state. Many people think he is biting more than he can swallow. But he thinks the risk is worth taking. And he is succeeding. The Newswatch team of Dan Agbese, editor-in-chief, Maureen Chigbo, general editor and Mike Akpan, editorial consultant was recently in Enugu. What the governor’s doing for his people, how he’s doing them and making success of them are the subject of our cover story this week. Governor Nnamani speaks to Newswatch editors Dan Agbese, editor-in-chief, Maureen Chigbo, general editor and Mike Akpan, editorial consultant on his achievements and his legacies. Excerpts: From what we have seen this afternoon, it is like it is the second phase of your development plan? Nnamani: I felt that things were more fundamental at home and I wanted to come back and be part of it. I also realized that the human system, man is born perfect; God created a perfect being right from the eggs, fertilization through the various stages if human development through maturity, the human system is perfect. I felt God should not go through such a process only to produce something that is imperfect, that man has greater calling to uplift society. Man has a responsibility to leave a better society than he met it. I felt just succeeding in America with a practice, a house, a family, a car- that there was more to it if it were back home. I needed to come back and be part of it and implement the vision of my people and implement the vision using political power to use Enugu State as a model of what change democracy can make to the so called third world. And being an Enugu boy growing up here, I was already in tune with the Enugu society. That was why I left America and came home. And of course my American background, training gave me the confidence that I could come here and move with the guys and succeed. When I came back to Nigeria and was blessed enough to become the Governor of Enugu State, we articulated a clear vision of our programmes for the state. We also felt that democracy then was essentially transitory, in motion, it is inherently unstable because it is experimental. And coming from America I was also a little bit anxious about the permanence of that democracy, about the stability of that democracy. I was also a little bit worried. And we felt that to defend that democracy; it must be protected by something more than the armored cars, artillery guns, and men in uniform. Democracy needed to be anchored by the people. And for the people to rise and defend that democracy it must be protected by something concrete for their investment. That was why we talked about dividends of democracy. That is when people vote something they get in return, what their vote represent not just equality, justice, freedom. Something that they can touch-water, roads, health facilities. When we talk about dividends of democracy, there are the new-look roads. We have the ring road network connecting all the local government headquarters. We are already building about 500 kilometres of asphalt road. We talked about our health district system, where we divided our state into 56 health districts, for primary health care. For secondary health care we use general hospitals. We ended up having 24 cottage hospitals. That was how we started. We did the same thing for education – school district system. Knowing fully well that we couldn’t put computers in all the schools, laboratory facilities in all the schools, modern equipment, libraries in all the schools, so we did what we called school districts centers, where group of schools will share these facilities. We also identified more than 200 communities, hired 2000 teachers for both primary and secondary schools. Many water projects made up of twin boreholes, 50,000-gallon tanks, and some as much as 14 kilometres of pipeline circulation. We built the law school; we built the Air force school and so many other things. That was what we did during the six years of our lives. And of course, two years into the first tenure I gave a presentation to the southern governor’s meeting. The presentation was so well received. The palpable energy generated during the speech was so good. So we started our lecture series. The lecture circuit became a form of self-education, self-enlightenment for me. It was in the cause of the lecture circuit that I ran into poverty. I had to do some work and had to study poverty and its implication in an emerging democracy. At the same time, DFID was also getting interested in Enugu State. So the whole thing happened at the same time. So by the time we were starting the second term we had become exposed to the DFID. I now became convinced that it was all about poverty. It was no longer dividend of democracy. It was all about poverty. Of course, in our first term of office, we were talking poverty but we didn’t call it that. We just didn’t click on it. So what we did with DFID was to try to define poverty? There are several definitions of poverty. People could be excluded either because of race. It could be capability –that is where the state fails to provide enabling environment for people to actualize there minimum capability either in terms of their reproductive rights, health, education facilities, environmental sustainability. So we defined poverty using a participatory means. What we did was that the stakeholders tried to identify what it means to poor and not poor. What we did was to get all the stakeholders – civil servants, okada riders, traditional rulers, NGO, traders etc. We called the whole society and locked ourselves up and held a series of dialogue, broke into groups to define poverty. We went into all definitions of poverty. Once we defined poverty in Enugu State, we set up what we call poverty reduction strategy. First of all, we set up what we call ministry of human development and poverty reduction. We broke it into health and human services, wealth creation, criminal justice system. We had immediate intervention programmes. Were you able to determine the level of poverty in Enugu? Nnamani: But, of course, you know these figures have become politicized with people in government trying as much as possible to keep it down and people outside trying to keep it up. Of course, those that are pro-government and those anti-government. But the bottom line is to look at the human development index, which looks at 189 countries. Nigeria is in bottom 18. If you look at access to computer, access to electricity, Nigeria could be way down there above Eritrea, Sudan, Afghanistan and one more country. Look at computer technology, which you know is n index of globalisation. If you look at globalisation as a major tool for countries getting out of poverty and look at computer needs, you will see that we are number four from bottom, which, of course, forms the three cannons of globalization - privatisation, information technology and democracy. So we came up with our poverty reduction strategy. At the same time we looked at the Millennium Development Goals, several indicators – reducing poverty by 2015, training students up to JSS 3, reducing infant mortality by two-thirds, decreasing maternal mortality by three-quarters and providing homes for hundreds of millions through global partnership. Government still has to provide for people in the rural areas. That was what we did through a holistic poverty reduction programme. There are several agencies. One is the DFID intervention programme. There is a programme called LEEMP – Local Environmental Empowerment Monitoring Programme. I believe DFID also has a programme called SSLGP. Let me give you an example how it works. We have what we call school meal plus. We call it school meal plus because it is more than a meal. It is a programme where an index child in a community gets a balanced meal a day. That child upon being integrated into the programme and on a yearly basis gets medical preparation to get medical records of what they call morphormetric data in terms of weight, height, hearing, document things like colour blindness, attention disorder and what it means to that child. We also need the documentation to buy vitamin supplements, if necessary provide malaria drugs. We want to make sure that the siblings are within the educational system. If the mum is pregnant she will need the help of the health system. That is why it is called the school meal plus. In addition to that, we have early child school learning system. That is, little kids at what we call the kindergarten, so that when the little ones are going they go with their smaller ones. So within the community, when the school meal plus is going on through DFID intervention programme, the SSLGP will provide rural roads within that community, provide electricity either in form of transformer or generator. LEEMP could also have an interventionist programme through a community committee. It could be health, electricity or water facilities. The rural water sanitation agencies, RUWAN, will come to that community and do a VIP latrine either within the school premises or within the community. Even though the target programme is school meal but SSLGP comes in to boreholes or shallow wells. This is a holistic approach to rural development. Another example of our intervention is the public service reform like the fire service, which went through a reform supported by DFID. Reforms that involve physical rehabilitation of the facilities, training. Capacity building to achieve service standard delivery in terms of response time, management of internally generated revenue. We also did public service reform in our civil service with computerization of our civil service records and proper IDS and services. They also did a charter in terms of service charter. What does the civil servant owe the general public? In the area of wealth creation, we had what we called neighborhood associations. But what we did was to formalize this neighborhood association in terns of factors – either contiguous or homogenous factor either in terms of number. So given this neighbourhood association, we can now plan for micro credit scheme or we can plan for security / vigilante. I am sure that Enugu State is the pilot of pilots in community policing. So in the area of wealth creation, we set up what we call business pack and also SME advisory center and what we call community business organizations. Working with DFID, we set up competition for young entrepreneurs. And those who won got N5 million, N3 million and N1 million to set up business ideas, monitor it and implement it. In the area of criminal justice system, working with what we called Access to Justice, which is now called Security, Justice and Growth, we did some reform of criminal justice system starting with automation of the office of justice. Refurbishing of the Ministry of Justice with computers and generators. We also did an update on the Laws of Enugu State. We have always used Laws of Anambra as it applied to Enugu State. Working with the DFID we produced Laws of Enugu State. I think they gave us N7 million and we brought N7 million to produce Laws of Enugu. We also did capacity building in the areas of alternative dispute resolution, record keeping . We also did capacity building for customary court judges. We set up a Citizenship Rights and Mediation Center that was commissioned when the ambassadors came. So we did a lot and also computerized our land registry. I believe we are going to work with DFID to computerize the judicial headquarters. In the area of health working with DFID we had a programme called PATHS (Partnership for Transforming Health Systems). Working with PATHS, we now went through the whole dialogue so when you are doing a report, what you do is to call stakeholders. Remember what I told you about the sectors, after having the stakeholders meeting, each of these sectors had to do its own series of dialogue to further identify poverty reduction strategy. So the health sector went over its stakeholders meeting again and decided that 56 health districts were just too much and they brought it down to seven health care districts. So by law we have seven. Health districts are to decentralize healthcare to the locality to make it easy for data collection. We got a lot of help from DFID. Initially, they gave us 500,000 pounds and later to spend up to four million pounds to furnish the Health Districts. What I am giving you is an overview of the major projects we are doing apart from the major projects you are seeing. Have you been able to assess the impact of your poverty reduction strategy? Nnamani: There is this federal government poverty reduction programme. Is Enugu State not part of this programme? Nnamani: What is that telling? Is it the right thing to do? Nnamani: Will you be able to complete all the projects you have before you leave office? Nnamani: How much is your state allocation of the Federation Account and how much have you spent on the projects alone? Nnamani: How successful is… Nnamani: How much did you spend on the university? Nnamani: The projects we visited are being handled by one contractor throughout. Nnamani: These projects are very major projects and I was wondering why you did not tackle them in your first term. Nnamani: I thought maybe it reflects your personal confidence that you have achieved the basic things and you can now concentrate on you legacies. Nnamani: How much do you spend on projects? Nnamani: You inherited some debts when you came into office? Nnamani: You have cleared all that? Nnamani: By 2007, you would have ruled this state much longer than anybody else. Nnamani: Service. I thought that in the process you must have acquired the status of Godfather? Nnamani: Are you actually telling us that you will not have a say in who becomes governor in 2007? Nnamani: Are you telling us that you are not interested in who succeeds you? Nnamani: You talk as if you are going into political oblivion. Nnamani: Are you interested in becoming the president? Nnamani: Are you interested in becoming the vice-president? Nnamani: So what is it you want? Nnamani: When we were inspecting projects, we heard people shouting Ebeano. What does it mean to you? Nnamani: Is it a slogan? Nnamani: How do you feel when they shout it? Nnamani: What percentage of our vision have you realized? Nnamani: What has been the most frustrating experience so far? Nnamani: The Nigerian elite has to understand that it is in his own interest to carry his people along in order to enjoy his money. It is the same thing with debt relief. Debt relief is not because the western nations love us that much. You have to understand that right from slavery, colonialisation that the problems of territory, urban unrest all has to do with poverty. So, again it is possible that by taking acre of debt relief and other problems of poverty we are building an environment for holistic peace.. so, for you to be comfortable you have to carry the masses along. There is an elitist deceit. Culled from Newswatch, November 14, 2005, pp. 16-32 |